For decades, AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) was the default for hydrocarbon fires; it is now being phased out because of its PFAS (forever chemicals) content. US, EU, Australia, and Turkey are transitioning to fluorine-free F3 (Fluorine-Free Foam). NFPA 11 updates performance and system requirements. This article combines technical, environmental, and operational perspectives.
The PFAS Problem
- AFFF contains PFOA/PFOS and short-chain PFAS
- Non-biodegradable (forever chemicals)
- Groundwater contamination: thousands of hectares impacted
- Health: cancer, immune, developmental effects
- EPA, EU REACH: phased ban 2023-2026
What Is F3?
F3 (Fluorine-Free Foam) appears in NFPA 11 as SFFF (synthetic fluorine-free foam): a foam concentrate based on a mixture of hydrocarbon surface active agents that is not formulated to contain PFAS (NFPA 11-2024, 3.3.11.8).
- Hydrocarbon surfactants and polymer additives instead of fluorosurfactants
- UL 162 and EN 1568 compliant
- Does not form an aqueous film (unlike AFFF); extinguishes by foam blanket
- AR-F3 (alcohol-resistant) for polar solvents
Performance Comparison
F3 vs AFFF lab and field tests:
- Gasoline: F3 at 80-90% of AFFF; slightly longer time
- Jet fuel: F3 comparable
- Polar solvents (ethanol, methanol): AR-F3 compatible; 6% concentration instead of 3%
- Burnback: F3 slightly weaker; more frequent re-application
- Fire size: Small-medium OK; very large tank fires debated
Conversion Steps
- Rinsing: Drain the old AFFF tank and piping, collect the AFFF solution, then rinse several times with PFAS-free water — residual PFAS must not mix with the new foam. Dispose of the rinsate per regulations (NFPA 11-2024 Annex E)
- Proportioner update: F3 viscosity differs; re-calibrate or replace
- Foam chamber/monitor: F3 flow pattern differs; nozzle may change
- Tank capacity: 6% concentration requires 2× tank if it was 3%
- UL-listed combo: Concentrate + proportioner + discharge device in one listing
- AFFF waste: Dispose as hazardous waste (high-temperature incineration)
Economics
- F3 concentrate: 20-40% above AFFF cost
- System conversion: cost depends on facility size
- AFFF disposal: added per-liter cost
- Long-term: avoid PFAS cleanup + health liability
Situation in Turkey
Turkey's Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change is working on PFAS guidance. Large refineries, petrochemical plants, major airports and aviation facilities have already started conversion. Smaller sites are mostly using up their AFFF stock — the market expects the transition to be complete by 2027. Local F3 production is limited; imports dominate.
Common Mistakes
- Adding F3 on top of AFFF: Contamination, unpredictable performance.
- Proportioner not re-set: F3 at 3% instead of 6% → underdose.
- Dumping AFFF waste to environment: Fine + cleanup cost.
- Non-UL-listed combo: Outside tested system, insurance dispute.
Conclusion
PFAS bans are rewriting the fire suppression industry. F3 is technically at 80-95% of AFFF; correct conversion is critical. Turkey will transition quickly once EU-aligned regulation lands. Facility managers must plan now; last-minute conversion is expensive and risky.

MEP Calc — 110+ Engineering Calculators
MEP Calc bundles 110+ engineering modules in one iOS app: 21 fire calculations (sprinkler, fire pump, FM-200 clean agent) plus heating, cooling, HVAC, plumbing, steam and natural gas. Download it on the App Store.
Download MEP Calc on the App Store
SprinkCalc — Fire Sprinkler Design Across Three Standards
SprinkCalc covers hazard classification, design density and area, K-factor selection, water demand and hydraulic calculations for NFPA 13, FM Global and BS EN 12845 in a single iOS app, and exports a professional PDF report. One of the few tools that unifies all three major fire protection standards.
Download SprinkCalc on the App StoreCore references: NFPA 11, NFPA 16, UL 162, EN 1568, EPA PFAS Regulation. Original NFPA post: NFPA Today - PFAS Foam Transition.