Glass-clad high-rises are the signature of modern architecture. But aluminum composite panels (ACM) behind the glass can spread fire rapidly up the facade. The 2017 Grenfell (London) and 2009 Mumbai Taj are two extreme examples. NFPA 285 defines a full-scale fire test for facade composite systems. Here we cover the test procedure, risk analysis and emerging regulation in Turkey.

Curtain Wall Anatomy

A typical curtain wall system:

Critical question: can these layers spread fire faster than the building can evacuate?

NFPA 285 Test Procedure

Full-scale fire test conducted on a two-story mock-up:

ACM Risk Assessment

Two core types in aluminum composite panels:

Cost difference is 15-30% per m2 — critical for fire safety.

Post-Grenfell Changes

The June 2017 Grenfell Tower fire (72 dead) triggered bans on PE-core ACM across the US, UK and EU:

Turkey Status

Turkey's BYKHY regulation Article 27 addresses facade fire safety indirectly. No NFPA 285-style full-scale test mandate yet. TSE EN 13501-1 Class A1/A2 is the practical baseline. Bare PE ACM is still seen on projects; insurers flag such buildings as 'high risk' with elevated premiums.

For the Mechanical Engineer

  1. Request insulation certification (A2/B-s1,d0 class) when facade documents arrive
  2. Watch sprinkler proximity to outer facade — no protrusion through windows
  3. Smoke exhaust must work during facade fires (positive pressure)
  4. Firestops between floors inside the facade are architect's responsibility — verify anyway

Facade sprinkler analysis with SprinkCalc

Exterior sprinkler layout, deluge curtain design and fire-rated system integration.

Learn More
Sources & Further Reading

Primary reference: NFPA 285 - Standard Fire Test Method. Grenfell Tower Inquiry reports are also critical. NFPA official: NFPA 285.

FS

Fatih Selvi

Mechanical engineer and software developer. 16+ years of MEP and fire protection experience.