A data centre came out of a five-year insurance survey with a list of major recommendations: the dry pipe valve trip test had not been done for three years, weekly fire pump run records were incomplete, and gauge calibration status was unknown. The site had been following an annual flow test regime, but FM Global DS 2-81 expects considerably more. This article summarises the weekly, monthly, annual, three-year and five-year expectations.

Weekly Tasks

Monthly Tasks

Annual Tasks

Three and Five Year Tasks

Practical Differences From NFPA 25

TaskFM DS 2-81NFPA 25
Weekly pump run10 minutes no-flow with records10 minutes no-flow with records
Dry pipe trip testFull trip every three yearsFull trip every three years
Internal inspectionFive yearly at several defined pointsFive yearly obstruction investigation
Sprinkler samplingBy age, earlier for dry sprinklersBy age across all types
External surveyAnnual insurer surveyOwner responsibility

Quick Checklist

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the main drain test actually tell you?

It compares static pressure with flowing pressure at the riser. A larger than expected drop indicates a restriction upstream - a partially closed valve, a blocked strainer or an obstructed main. It is the single most informative annual test because it checks the supply path that everything else depends on, and it takes minutes to perform.

Why does FM require a full dry pipe trip test rather than a partial one?

A partial trip proves the valve moves; a full trip proves that water actually reaches the most remote inspector's test connection within the required time. Only the full test verifies the water delivery time that the whole dry system design depends on, which is why it is required on a three year cycle.

Why is internal pipe inspection needed if there are no leaks?

Corrosion products accumulate internally long before a pinhole appears, and they obstruct sprinklers and branch lines while the system still looks sound from outside. Endoscopic inspection at several points every five years catches tuberculation and sludge while remediation is still straightforward.

How do FM expectations differ from NFPA 25 in practice?

The task list is broadly similar, but FM applies it more strictly and adds an annual insurer survey with formal recommendations attached to the policy. Sites that comply with NFPA 25 alone frequently still receive recommendations, most often for missing records rather than missing work.

SprinkCalc — Fire Sprinkler Design Across Three Standards

SprinkCalc covers hazard classification, design density and area, K-factor selection, water demand and hydraulic calculations for NFPA 13, FM Global and BS EN 12845 in a single iOS app, and exports a professional PDF report.

Download SprinkCalc on the App Store

MEP Calc — 86+ Engineering Calculators

MEP Calc bundles 86+ engineering modules in one iOS app: 21 fire calculations plus heating, cooling, HVAC, plumbing, steam and natural gas.

Download MEP Calc on the App Store
Standards & References

FM Global Property Loss Prevention Data Sheet DS 2-81 (Inspection, Testing and Maintenance of Fire Protection Systems); NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems.

FS

Fatih Selvi

Mechanical engineer and software developer with field experience in MEP and fire protection, working actively with NFPA, FM Global and BS EN 12845 on site projects.